Latest topics
» BACK ONLINE MUTHAFUKAAA
Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:26 pm by ShinLuBuSiryu

» New youtube change
Thu Mar 01, 2012 7:58 am by ShinLuBuSiryu

» Warriors Orochi 3 / 無双OROCHI2
Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:56 pm by ShinLuBuSiryu

» Romance of the Three Kingdoms XII
Sun Jan 22, 2012 5:37 am by ShinLuBuSiryu

» Pokemon + Nobunaga's Ambition
Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:29 am by ShinLuBuSiryu

» The Create A Scenario Thread
Mon Jan 09, 2012 8:40 am by ShinLuBuSiryu

» Takenaka Island (Of Epicness)
Fri Jan 06, 2012 10:23 am by ShinLuBuSiryu

» Beta Stage ~ Thoughts so far?
Thu Dec 29, 2011 2:52 am by ShinLuBuSiryu

» Gen's Video Collection
Thu Dec 29, 2011 2:02 am by ShinLuBuSiryu

June 2018
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Calendar Calendar


Historical Discussion Rules

Go down

Historical Discussion Rules

Post  Takenaka Hanbei on Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:01 am

It is all right if you write Japanese names based in the western order (Given Name; Family Name) when the discussion is about the games or when RPing.

However, this is NOT the game or RP forums. This is the Historical Discussion forum, therefore, it is REQUIRED that you write the names in the correct, historical, order (Family Name; Given Name). An example of what is accepted would be: Oda Nobunaga. You do NOT write it as: Nobunaga Oda.

If you write the names in the western order, the mods will only edit your posts and send you a PM reminding you about this rule. After consistent and intentional breaking of this rule, we will give you a warning, and if that is ignored, then your posting priviledges WILL be revoked.

This is not a hard rule to follow, so it shouldn't happen if you take the time to read the rules.

Next is something you SHOULD do: CITATION.

As to why this is suggested, academically, you need to cite the sources of your claims. Think of it like a "work cited" page of an essay.

You can write all the most ridiculous "facts", but without anything cited, who will believe you? No one. They will remain ridiculous until they are backed by legitimate sources. With sources, even the most far gone of ideas can be proven true.

While we know this isn't school, it is still encouraged that you prove your points before you begin bashing what other people say or try to make yourself seem like the sole "intelligent" person. Of course, people can also point out if you have perhaps misinterpreted a source and tell you if that source is "no good" and such. In addition to this, however, you can also help others who are more interested in a topic find a good book or source to learn from.

Note, you are not required to cite information that is "general knowledge" what is considered "general knowledge" is up to you, however. Remember that not everyone may be as well-versed or knowledgable in history as you are.

Examples of general knowledge would be: Mitsuhide assassinating Nobunaga or Cao Cao losing at Chibi.

Things that are not general knowledge, however, would include: "Sima Yi enjoyed going into battle wearing a tutu" or "Zhuge Liang rode a pimp mobile into battle" would require sourcing (though these are horrid examples).

Citations are not required, but they CAN be used to your advantage. If you are opposed to what someone claims, then you cannot just spout random arguments without legitimate sources. Likewise, their arguments are useless without sources and you can just dismiss their claims for lack of citation.

Remember, this is not a rule, just encouragement. This is not to deter people from posting in the history forums, but rather to ensure there is accuracy to what members say.
avatar
Takenaka Hanbei
Moderator

Posts : 47
Points : 65
Join date : 2011-12-21
Age : 23
Location : In Your Fridge.

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum